X
Record #65835

An assessment of the impact of traditional rice cooking practice and eating habits on arsenic and iron transfer into the food chain of smallholders of Indo-Gangetic plain of South-Asia: Using AMMI and Monte-Carlo simulation model

Journal
Heliyon
Original paper date
Apr 15, 2024
Institution
Department of Environmental Science, University of Kalyani, Kalyani, 741235, West Bengal, India · Plant Stress Biology & Metabolomics Laboratory, Department of Life Science and Bioinformatics, Assam University, Silchar, 788011, Assam, India · ICAR−Indian Institute of Water Management, Bhubaneswar, 751023, Odisha, India · ICAR-Directorate of Weed Research, Jabalpur, 482004, Madhya Pradesh, India · School of Environmental Studies, Jadavpur University, Kolkata, 700032, West Bengal, India · Centre for Environmental Science & Engineering, Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur, 208016, India · Department of Environmental Science, Amity School of Life Sciences (ASLS), Amity University, Madhya Pradesh (AUMP), Gwalior, 474005, Madhya Pradesh, India · Department of Chemistry, NIT Jamshedpur, Adityapur, Jamshedpur, 831014, Jharkhand, India · Department of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry, Bihar Agricultural University, Sabour, Bhagalpur, 813210, India · Institute of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Slovak University of Agriculture, Nitra, Tr. A. Hlinku 2, 949 01, Nitra, Slovak, Slovakia · Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine and King Khalid University Hospital, King Saud University, Medical City, P.O. Box 2925, Riyadh, 11461, Saudi Arabia · Department of Botany, Hindu College Moradabad (Mahatma Jyotiba Phule Rohilkhand University, Bareilly), Moradabad, 244001, Uttar Pradesh, India · Division of Soil Science, Bangladesh Wheat and Maize Research Institute, Dinajpur, 5200, Bangladesh
Open access
No
Article type
Research Article
Broad categories
(ENV) Food Science(HSC) Nutrition(HSC) Public Health and Safety
Citation lifecycle

How this paper is being cited

Pre-retraction
14
Same day
0
Post-retraction
9
% post-retraction
90.0%
~16.8 citations/yr before retraction · ~5.7 citations/yr after
— citing papers

Who is still citing this work

Loading…
Back to browse